Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
Does anyone know if all the interfaces to the LHC ring are optically coupled?
Because of the enormous changing magnetic field, I'd like to know how they deal with induced pick up. It appears that one of the PLCs had to be replaced that controls the cryogenics and perhaps a voltage spike killed it. I'm also surprised that the PLCs are not doubled up to offer some sort of redundancy in the case of a failure, given the major delay they cause as a consequence and their relative low cost.
Because of the enormous changing magnetic field, I'd like to know how they deal with induced pick up. It appears that one of the PLCs had to be replaced that controls the cryogenics and perhaps a voltage spike killed it. I'm also surprised that the PLCs are not doubled up to offer some sort of redundancy in the case of a failure, given the major delay they cause as a consequence and their relative low cost.
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
Instead of asking so many questions about LHC design, why don't you read how the LHC is designed yourself?
LHC design report is a bit aged and many things have been improved since then but I guess it's a good place to start with.
If you feel it's not detailed enough, you can also look into baseline documentation.
LHC design report is a bit aged and many things have been improved since then but I guess it's a good place to start with.
If you feel it's not detailed enough, you can also look into baseline documentation.
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
Hey thanks!Kasuha wrote:Instead of asking so many questions about LHC design, why don't you read how the LHC is designed yourself?
LHC design report is a bit aged and many things have been improved since then but I guess it's a good place to start with.
If you feel it's not detailed enough, you can also look into baseline documentation.
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
In any big installation emc is an issue and had been carefully built into the design The magnetic fields of the machine are not the major problem - more mundane things like motors and pumps cause bigger headaches.Does anyone know if all the interfaces to the LHC ring are optically coupled?
Because of the enormous changing magnetic field, I'd like to know how they deal with induced pick up. It appears that one of the PLCs had to be replaced that controls the cryogenics and perhaps a voltage spike killed it. I'm also surprised that the PLCs are not doubled up to offer some sort of redundancy in the case of a failure, given the major delay they cause as a consequence and their relative low cost.
Redundancy is used wherever possible - but it is not always possible. The magnetic bearings of the cold compressors are delicate things and any interruption in the control of them could be a problem. Switching from 1 PLC to another seamlessly is not easy ...
The reason for the plc failure is not known (yet).
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
How expensive are Power converters? A power converter fault in S2 dumped today's beam so I can only think they're too expensive or unlikely to fail to duplicate.pcatom wrote:Redundancy is used wherever possible - but it is not always possible. The magnetic bearings of the cold compressors are delicate things and any interruption in the control of them could be a problem. Switching from 1 PLC to another seamlessly is not easy ...
The reason for the plc failure is not known (yet).
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
As pcatom said, redundancy is not quite as simple as 'let's buy two of everything'. There is also the question of finding space for 2 systems, having suitable alarms to know when the primary system is failing, whether the backup can kick in fast enough to prevent a dump...
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
relative low cost ...
If i am reading the figures at the bottom of todays cyro report correctly. The cost of upgrading the 65 PLCs to get reducndancy is 1.5 Million swiss franks + 2 man-years of labour for cabling and code re-write.
best regards
Dave
If i am reading the figures at the bottom of todays cyro report correctly. The cost of upgrading the 65 PLCs to get reducndancy is 1.5 Million swiss franks + 2 man-years of labour for cabling and code re-write.
best regards
Dave
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
[spluttering cough] 1.5 million SFs for material alone to add another 65PLCs?morgad wrote:relative low cost ...
If i am reading the figures at the bottom of todays cyro report correctly. The cost of upgrading the 65 PLCs to get reducndancy is 1.5 Million swiss franks + 2 man-years of labour for cabling and code re-write.
best regards
Dave
According to the report, the MTBF is acceptable so they don't have to do anything. The report doesn't say anything about the total cost of failures in the PLC chain to the cryos over the total lifetime of the LHC.
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
How can you measure the cost of downtime? The LHC does not produce a product that can be given a value in dollars.The loss is in terms of scientific data.
In direct money terms the LHC probably saves loads of cash when it goes down because they save on electricity. That is a high cost greater than the costs of replacing most individual parts that fail.
In any case there are many ways the beams can be lost but they can quickly be brought back with a new peak luminosity. The overall loss should be minimal provided the dumps are not too frequent. When they are running at maximum luminosity without constant changes we will see how well it runs.
Since they are likely to beat their target luminosity by some factor this year it is not likely that they could make a case for spending extra money on better reliability.
In direct money terms the LHC probably saves loads of cash when it goes down because they save on electricity. That is a high cost greater than the costs of replacing most individual parts that fail.
In any case there are many ways the beams can be lost but they can quickly be brought back with a new peak luminosity. The overall loss should be minimal provided the dumps are not too frequent. When they are running at maximum luminosity without constant changes we will see how well it runs.
Since they are likely to beat their target luminosity by some factor this year it is not likely that they could make a case for spending extra money on better reliability.
Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
You can't measure it exactly, but you can certainly approximate it and so it's worth doing just to see if there are losses and where they're going. Part is going to be in people's time being paid for less efficiently while the beam is down, which is going to depend upon the cause of the beam down.PhilG wrote:How can you measure the cost of downtime?
Is it worth replacing a faulty PLC that causes the cryogenics to inoperate for over 24 hours every month?
Is it worth having a full time PLC programmer, or should they contract out?
Is it worth hiring a company to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of running costs against down time?
It's not possible to do anything exactly and approximations still make a task wothwhiile doing in the long run.