No. John Ellis, who is one of LSAG, said something like: “the best proof that LHC is safe is to switch it on”. Do you like such empirical evidence?
Have you payed attention to the 1 hour long scientific lecture preceding this lighthearted statement?
The main support of LSAG-report is a comparison with cosmic rays. These support can be easily ruined by knowing that 1) TeV-TeV cosmo-cosmo p-p collisions in the whole Solar system are extremely rarefied even at the Hubble time; 2) equivalent cosmo-atmospheric collisions can lead to creation of condensate with TeV kinetic energy per constituent element, whose rest energy is about GeV and binding energy is about 1-100 MeV. This condensate will be immediately ruined be TeV collisions with atmosphere particles. 3) Condensate, made on LHC, can have the same rest and binding energies, but its kinetic energy can be close to zero. It will not be ruined but can grow and ruin Earth. That is why all mentioning about cosmic rays must be thrown away. That is why LSAG-report must be thrown into rubbish bucket. Our Civilization is a gamer in a Russian Roulette. So, John Ellis is correct, - “the best proof that LHC is safe is to switch it on”, OR “the best proof that LHC is deadly dangerous is to switch it on”. .
MagneticTrap wrote:Every tenth bucket in your garden is a nuclear fuel, which are K39 and HI, but this fuel will not burn in one stage.
Of course, any element lighter than iron is potential nuclear fuel. And in centers of old stars they actually burn.
There is a very big difference. You can not write any two-stage reaction except my reaction. In my reaction there is no transition of total proton behind the Colombian barrier of heavy K-nucleus. K40 and HI interact by their halos, through recharge of proton into neutron. Resulting neutron is captured by K39, transforming it into K-40.
MagneticTrap wrote:Point me on the error. Ha-ha-ha.
Every time you came with any real maths you were proven wrong so recently you only come with graphs and numbers you pull out your sleeve. You neither scare nor impress me with these. What you're doing is just plain wrong, on many levels.
Anyway ... to point the error, right?
K39 + n + p --> K40 + p --> Ca40 + n
1/ it's not even chain reaction. It requires constant supply of protons and even number of neutrons is not multiplied, you get one neutron in and one out
It not is a single-chain reaction, but N-chain reaction. N – the number of parallel reactions.
Your string K39 + n + p --> K40 + p --> Ca40 + n is not correct.
My even reactions occur in one place, and odd reactions occur in another place.
Yes, it requires a constant supply of protons and the same number of K39.
The overwhelming majority of neutrons and K40 isotopes are restored.
Of course, some neutrons and K40 isotopes are constantly lost without performing a needed reaction.
So our station needs some source of neutrons or K40-isotopes. If we have one of them we can make both of them. There are many methods to have a small supply of pure K40. Adding it to the multiple reaction chains we can support the constant process of two-stage burning of K39 and H1.
K40 can be extracted from natural mixture of K39, K40, K41.
K40 can be received by bombardment of gaseous K39 by neutrons of uranium power plants.
Kasuha wrote:3/ earth is not made of pure K39
It is probably, you do not understand the scheme of the process.
Here is very simplified scheme of the reactor.
0 – K40 foil, or may be, a circular beam of K40 nuclei; 1 – Proton beam; 2 – Trajectory of Ca40 ions. 3 – Trajectory of neutrons; 4 – Neutron moderator; 5 – Trap for Ca40 ions; 6 – Trajectories of K40 ions; 7 – Gamma quanta. 8 – Volume with dense gaseous K39. 9. – Trap for K40; 10 – Absorber of gamma quanta; R – Resonance devise, in order to increase the cross-section of the odd reactions.
Of course, I clearly understand that there are many technical problems. But if physicists would not spend their forces on the building of death machines, they would solve the technical problems of the proposed energy source.
The amount of K on the Earth is millions times bigger than the amount of uranium or deuterium! So K/H energy source can be regarded as eternal.
There is much bigger probability that we all be killed soon or already are doomed to die. Physicists, open your eyes, stop colliders, go out from TeV energies, do not try to create a particle of God, because you can create its antiparticle.
Make, please, things, which are useful to people.