rasalhauge wrote:
Again, you show a complete lack of understanding regarding how probability works. Let me enlighten you; If you give a 70% chance of something bad happening at p-p collisions one year at any given energy range, and that 70% is proven wrong, then there is impossible to get a 50% chance of the similar thing happening latter on.
My approximate assessments, made in December last year:
Physicists will ruin the Earth ~ 80%;
Physicists will ruin the Earth by LHC ~ 70%;
Physicists will ruin the Earth by LHC at 2*3,5 TeV ~ 50%;
…
My approximate assessments, made now:
Physicists will ruin the Earth or they had already create the growing dangerous condensate which will kill us ~ 50 %.
Physicists will ruin the Earth by further p-p and HI-HI collisions at LHC ~ 40 %.
Physicists will ruin the Earth by HI-HI collisions at LHC ~ 30 %.
…
Do not forget that the duration of switched Earth’s explosion is about 500-1000 days.
The most dangerous days to create dangerous condensates are:
several days after the start of HI-HI collisions, 9-th of November 2010;
several days after the start of p-p collision with the energy 2*7 TeV, 2013;
start of future ILC, Nika and other high energy colliders.
Nuclear physicists are crazy. They do not want to solve the world’s energy crisis in MeV energies, but they play the death game with Nature in the region of collaptical explosions. This part of physics must be renamed from “Nuclear Physics” into “Suicidal Physics”.
rasalhauge wrote:Also, I've been meaning to ask you one thing regarding the "dangerous condensate". How do you figure that would work? Like a runaway reaction of Bose-Einsten Condensate?
Magnetic hole is a Bose-Einstein Condensate.
Strange matter, Nutronized strange matter, Charmed strange matter, 2-generation matter… are Fermi-Dirack Condensates. But if constituent elements of the last condensates would be paired, then it can be regarded as Bose-Einstein Condensate.
rasalhauge wrote:And as for the truth; I'll put my life in CERN's hands any given day, they have managed to produce testable claims strengthened by empirical evidence. Where are your testable claims? Where are your empirical evidence to support those claims?
No. John Ellis, who is one of LSAG, said something like: “the best proof that LHC is safe is to switch it on”. Do you like such empirical evidence?
rasalhauge wrote:… you attack LSAG and claim that they are the ones lacking credibility?
In that report there are several math and logical errors. But the main are lie assertions.
I’ve wrote earlier:
If all of people on the planet would know the truth, then the GeV- and TeV-physics would be closed forever, then physicists would developed MeV nuclear physics, and it is very probable that we would be able to solve the energy problem with the help of my reaction with catalyst:
K40 + p --> Ca40 +
n + 0.529 MeV.
K39 +
n -->
K40 + 7.8 MeV.
K40 + p --> Ca40 +
n + 0.529 MeV.
K39 +
n -->
K40 + 7.8 MeV.
K40 + p --> Ca40 +
n + 0.529 MeV.
K39 +
n -->
K40 + 7.8 MeV.
…
rasalhauge wrote:So you are going to solve the energy crisis with that equation, for real? What was the response from the scientific community of that incredibly elaborate calculation?
1. Yes, this is a third direction in the common MeV nuclear physics. You know only two directions: fission of uranium and fusion of hydrogen isotopes. Several years ago I proposed the third direction two-stage fusion of widespread K39 and H1, using rarefied K40, which is disappears in even reactions and is restored in the odd reactions. 2. Scientific community is not interested in the solution of world energy crisis, but they are dreaming about the particle of God. That will kill us.
Kasuha wrote:.., you'd not be posting such nonsense.
MagneticTrap wrote:
K39 + n --> K40 + 7.8 MeV.
K40 + p --> Ca40 + n + 0.529 MeV.
Last time I checked, neither LHC not Earth are made of K39.
Every tenth bucket in your garden is a nuclear fuel, which are K39 and HI, but this fuel will not burn in one stage.
Kasuha wrote:And if you try to suggest me that Ca40 decays to K39...
Open your eyes. Ca40 is a product of the proposed reaction. Ca40 is a stable element.
K40 is radioactive isotope with very long life-time period. That is why it still exists in the Earth’s mixture of K39, K40, K41. Yes, K40 is very rarefied, but it is restored in the proposed reactions.
Kasuha wrote:…you have some kind of error in your equations.
Are you a physicist? Point me on the error. Ha-ha-ha. Or try to write the analogues reaction. You will fail to do that, - K is unique element on the Earth for such type of reaction. That is the energy Klondike for human civilization. But the group of Suicidal Physicists would rather ruin the Earth with the help of RHIC, Tevatron, LHC, future ILC and Nika.