Good times? maybe

I think, in my humble opinion your final statement is wrong, it should read "And should my penultimate statement be wrong"LarryS wrote:While your intentions are most honorable, I think, in my humble opinion, that your punctuation is not quite correct. As I see the world (at the Quantum level) the statement should read:
“Good times! Maybe?”
For I am still not sure that the Higgs is really there.
And should my last statement be wrong, then I would be most pleased ...
Not much I fear. One of the slightly worrying aspects of the LHC is that they really don't seem to be finding much. They are certainly making progress in the sense that they are ruling out a lot of theories but there doesn't really seem to be anything majorly new.Stephen wrote:Good article - I'm curious as to what happens next.
Yes I felt that when the ASACUSA experiemnt proudly announced they had accurately weighed anti-protons to nine decimal places of accuracy . . and discovered it was exactly the same as the proton. You could imagine the raised eyebrows of people who were saying "You spent *how* much to discover that ?"Stephen wrote:Then I guess it would be tough for scientists to convince their governments that future accelerators are necessary.
Dear count di Torino,LarryS wrote:
Yours in service
Count Carpaccio d’Torino, Aristocrat and Philanderer
Older twin brother of Carpaccio d’Torino, Astronomer, Mathematician …
No harm done LarryLarryS wrote:
Lady Charmed Quark,
Good morrow, and with all humble apologies, allow me to say that it was not my intention to bring any displeasure to yourself or to cast dispersions on the fine work you have done at this site. For my epistle on grammar structures, I deeply apologize; it was perhaps a brief moment of ego.