Well matie all we can do is look at the facts and make a determination from there i guess.
Below is what HE says he is in HIS words @ the court case HE didn't attend:
NOTE: I have no idea if any of the statements are true or not ill simply lay out all the info I could find
"1: I am a System Scientist specialized in Cosmology and Time Theory. I obtained my undergraduate degree at Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain. I followed with my post-graduate studies at Columbia University, New York and developed a career as a Writer on scientific themes in Spain."
"2: I also chair the Annual World Conferences on the Science of Duality, (the study of the Universe with 2 time arrows or ‘directions of future’, energy and information) at the International Systems Society (ISSS.ORG) and have published in European magazines, on the field of Duality and the Arrows of Time."
http://www.isss.org/conferences/cancun2 ... rogram.pdf
^ he as a small article in this, again helps with the background, I could not find any reference to him being a member of the board etc.
http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proc ... e/view/651
^ again an article written within the ISSS.
There are no more info/references I could find regarding his stature with ISSS.
"3: As a leading researcher in the field of Time Theory I am the author of a series of books and articles on Cosmology and Relativity (“The Living Universe”, “Time Cycles”) in which I propose an extension of Dr. Einstein’s Principle of Equivalence to explain the origin of mass. Thus, I have been interested in the experiments that are currently scheduled to take place at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN) that will research the nature of Mass."
OK, his words, so clearly no background in the field he's portraying himself to be an expert in, based SOLEY on his own words.
SO now in the early days he believed that the main "point" in the LHC is to provide the ultimate reward to its researchers.
"However, because the dangers of producing strange quarks and Tau quarks are known, and their production en masse will not be a ‘new discovery’; hence their production will not advance Physics. Likewise, their production would not provide a Nobel Prize to CERN’s researchers – the ultimate goal of all experimentalists – if the Earth were consumed."
But to me this is the worst bit, i mean all this is how it was written to the courts not the stuff he wrote on MSN message board and etc.
"The Physicists at CERN have systematically ignored the fact that the Large Hadron Collider might well be essentially a Dark Matter factory, and never publicly speak of the dangers involved. As an expert in Mass Theory, well aware of those potential dangers, I consider that behavior irresponsible"
Highlighted to bring it to your attention, ok he is an expert in Mass theory, with no qualifications no background, no notes that he has done experimental work, no mention to the court how he became one, and ofc WHY THE HELL ISNT HE AT THE LHC THEN IF HE IS AN EXPERT, that's what they are bloody doing it for, (amongst others), what is behind mass?!.
Again these are his words, he is an expert without any background on how he became one.
this is the point 2 years ago i well, made up my mind about him, ofc if you want i can always dig up more.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... clnk&gl=uk
^Court case filing