The place to discuss the LHC. Commissioning, operation, issues, events ....
-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:27 pm
-
Sphereix8
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:42 am
- Location: Oregon, USA
Post
by Sphereix8 » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:16 am
Can't believe it, the 12 performance graph on the LHC_OP page is about to have a straight line all the way across!
-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:14 am
-
Xymox
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:55 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Az USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Xymox » Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:49 am
If I were them I would just let it run...
Good burn in for all the equipment... Good test for everything...
AND great for the experiments... After that last 3-4 days of oopsies...
-
morgad
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:43 am
- Location: Devon, UK
-
Contact:
Post
by morgad » Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:39 am
from this mornings progess report -
Plan for the day:
Keep this fill depending on luminosity lifetime. Experiments to tell us
:-)
-
Xymox
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:55 pm
- Location: Phoenix, Az USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Xymox » Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:50 am
They are going for 24hrs.. Just so they can say they did it..
-
gronos
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:32 am
Post
by gronos » Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:07 pm
Well I don't think they made 24hrs, but it looks like they got past 18hrs which is certainly a record. The collisions from ATLAS look great.
Rich Gronostajski
Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences
University at Buffalo
-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:09 pm
Ya, made it 18hrs, one heck of a run!
Congrats again to Cern!

-
filip
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:29 pm
Post
by filip » Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:30 pm
I've just checked the LHC status screen 1 and there's the energy set to 7864 GeV. Is it a test of the maximum energy setting or just some nonsense? I thought that the 2x7 GeV collisions will require major reconfiguration of the whole device after the 2x3.5 burn in.
Anyway, I was watching the 18+ hours run on the public pages and it was fascinating.
-
Shadowdraxx
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:03 am
Post
by Shadowdraxx » Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:06 pm
its just the software that that's all, the machine needs re-wiring for 100% safe 14TEV runs
-
Danny252
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:45 pm
Post
by Danny252 » Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:35 pm
filip wrote:I've just checked the LHC status screen 1 and there's the energy set to 7864 GeV. Is it a test of the maximum energy setting or just some nonsense? I thought that the 2x7 GeV collisions will require major reconfiguration of the whole device after the 2x3.5 burn in.
Anyway, I was watching the 18+ hours run on the public pages and it was fascinating.
It defaults to that number when in one of the modes - Access I think.
-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:46 pm
Looks like another good start, beam for almost 1hr and ramping now. Wish'em luck for another long run!
-
Harbles
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 10:22 pm
- Location: Mississauga, Ontario. Canada
Post
by Harbles » Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:56 am
-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:24 am
2 hrs+ uptime and flattop on P1, looks like a good run start for sure.
Harbles, could not get the cms link to work- overloaded?
Hope they go all day!

-
mrgumby
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:53 am
- Location: New Zealand
Post
by mrgumby » Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:59 am
Hi Harbles..that link seems to want a "nice" password
