The place to discuss the LHC. Commissioning, operation, issues, events ....
-
scorpion
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:23 pm
Post
by scorpion » Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:01 pm
I liked the quote from one of the boffins when he said 'we may even discover some unknown unknowns'

-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:20 am
New Record! Beam for over 8 hours and at 3.5TeV too!
-
gronos
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:32 am
Post
by gronos » Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:18 am
Whoops, beams gone. Hope there were some interesting collisions.
Rich Gronostajski
Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences
University at Buffalo
-
jmayes
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:46 pm
- Location: USA
Post
by jmayes » Thu Apr 01, 2010 4:58 am
I read around 10 hours, looks like a new record to me

-
Danny252
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:45 pm
Post
by Danny252 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:11 pm
Seems like Cryo is rather borked again today. Page 1 says they intend to sort it out by 2000.
So whilst we wait, seems we'll be attempting to break Igor...
-
CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Post
by CharmQuark » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:18 pm
Danny252 wrote:Seems like Cryo is rather borked again today. Page 1 says they intend to sort it out by 2000.
So whilst we wait, seems we'll be attempting to break Igor...
hahaha

Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.
-
Danny252
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:45 pm
Post
by Danny252 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:55 pm
Danny252 wrote:by 2000.
2200 now!
-
Kasuha
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:22 pm
Post
by Kasuha » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:24 pm
No wonder, looks like parts of the machine had time to warm up a lot. Still too many red squares on cryo page.
-
Kasuha
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:22 pm
Post
by Kasuha » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:20 am
Today's morning dump was scary.
-
Shadowdraxx
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:03 am
Post
by Shadowdraxx » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:31 am
Kasuha wrote:Today's morning dump was scary.
how so mate?
Yesterdays Atlas fireworks were mad tho, nothing.... nothing.... BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM tracks everywhere so much you couldn't make any sense lol
-
Kasuha
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:22 pm
Post
by Kasuha » Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:28 pm
I was looking at page1 shortly after the beam was dumped and they put on beam tracking screens showing one beam mark in the center and one way off (by centimeters, not millimeters). Should this happen with full intensity beam I'd be afraid about beam pipes getting perforated by it.
-
chriwi
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:19 pm
- Location: Stuttgart Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by chriwi » Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:19 pm
Now it is already the second time I see a dump during setting up for phzsics with the reason "COLL-MOT-..." while moving in the collimators.
What is that?
bye
chriwi
-
LarryS
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Seymour, CT, USA
Post
by LarryS » Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:50 pm
Not sure if this will fully answer your question but from the "CERN BE - OP eLogbook"
Unprogrammed dump. When completing collimator sequence. TCT and TCLs were out of tollerance.
I have been (very slowly) putting together a spread-sheet of all the acronyms used on the various screens; I have the following defs ...
TCT - Target Collimator Tertiary: Tertiary Collimator
TCL - Target Collimator Long