Stephen, all you need to know is on the first page.Stephen wrote:This article seems very accurate and fact based. You can just skip to the conclusions section to get the general idea, because the paper is very long. Is there any way to disprove it, or is the author right in his conclusions and the catastrophic implications to the LHC? I'm getting really scared.
It says "Draft for Discussion" - until it has been reviewed by qualified scientists and published as an accepted scientific paper I'm not even going to bother looking at it let alone worrying about it.
*That* is how science is done, anyone can publish anything they like but until it's been professionally reviewed it's worthless.