Page 1 of 7

666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:41 am
by Beast
Bible. Apocalypse of John.
Chapter 13
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of
the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred
threescore and six (vide infra).

Chapter 17
15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore
sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues (LHC).
16 And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate
the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her
flesh, and burn her with fire.
17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree,
and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be
fulfilled.
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth
over the kings of the earth (CERN).

Beast

Burning of water in the reserved space of sphere.

Dear Sirs!
I kindly ask you to do applied research of water burning in the
reserved space of sphere. Analogy: the kernel of the planet, the kernel
of a living cell.
The whole plastic sphere with mirror metallic coating on the outside,
24mm in diameter, filled with distilled water was placed in the centre
of a pan 410mm in diameter and 320mm in height with the solution of
cement. At the beginning of the cement becoming solid there was formed
even pressure on water in the sphere by analogy with sonoluminescence.
As the result, during some hours the solution of concrete reached the
final hardness and got warmed up to 40*C in the centre of the sphere
surface and a bit less on the edge of the sphere surface. During 24
hours the concrete was gradually cooling down. Further, on the surface
of the concrete there was noticed a defect – an orifice of less than 1mm
beneath the bulging of 45mm in diameter and 4mm in height leading to the
sphere with water – which stopper the burning of the water in the centre
of the reserved space of the sphere.
The burning of hydrogen is accompanied by release of free energy
4,95eV, which is necessary for dissociation of two molecules of water
into molecular hydrogen and oxygen. The explosion of detonating mixture
containing two molecules of hydrogen and one molecule of oxygen is
accompanied by release of energy equal to the sum of 14,12eV and 4,95eV
out of which 14,12eV is consumed for the bond breaking of the molecules
of hydrogen and oxygen. Otherwise the reaction does not occur.
Consequently, under dissociation of two molecules of water in the
reserved space of sphere by the energy of 4,95eV, the energy of 14,12eV
is released which is conditioned by the necessary process of formation
of molecules of hydrogen and oxygen, which is impossible under the given
temperature conditions. This consequence is the cause of burning of
water in the rational conditions of the sphere.
Summing up. Having filled up the reserved space of the sphere, which
possesses the function of thermostat, with water and having created the
necessary energy for dissociation of water into and oxygen, in the
reserved space, we get a process accompanied by exothermic reactions of
atoms and hydrogen under which electrons emitting photons shift to the
lower levels, as water under the action of thermal energy must be
broadened in volume, but placed in reserved space of the sphere it
cannot carry out this work.
We suppose that in the sum of the particle interactions, as a result of
even warming of the sphere, vibrations will start from the inner surface
of the sphere in the direction to the centre of the sphere. In the
centre, three contacting particles of equal volumes will be stopped at a
particle of one volume. The fixed ratio of any of the three particles to
the central one will be six (666). The circle circumscribing the three
particles
has the fixed ratio to the central particle of 13. Rotation of a
separate particle of the three contacting particles can be perpendicular
to the circle of their contact. The formed material – a particle with
the absolute sliding surface which is possible under absolute symmetry
of the particle in space between the three rotating particles takes the
path motion on the principle of feedback with return to the initial
point which creates the field of the sphere.
Literature: В. Lewis, G. Von Elbe "Combustion, Flame and Explosions in
Gases." 1987.
Please advise your decision.
Sincerely Yours, Edward Pogorelov.

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:43 am
by Shadowdraxx
Anyone else have the energy to deal with this one? i cant even be arsed to read it I stopped at:

Bible

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:41 pm
by Danny252
I only came to see if he had a picture of CERN's logo. He didn't :(

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:45 pm
by Xymox
Yes im disappointed. No pictures.. I guess Magnetic Trap really set the bar pretty high on the scale for this type of post...

I will read more tonight and respond... I do have some things to say.

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:49 pm
by Xymox
These guys need to realize that L O N G posts loose peoples attention right away so their entire point is lost..

Im just not going to read all that..

Well maybe... If its as entertaining as Magnetic Trap's wonders I will. Sorta..

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:57 pm
by Allan
I managed to skim through it and found nothing of interest. :twisted:

Allan

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:19 pm
by BenM
I think he has missed the part in particle physics 101 where they say "subatomic particles behave like particles and waves at the same time" and aside from that it was the typical nonsensical jumble of scientific sounding sentences.

Where do we get such quality trolls from? :twisted:

B.

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:08 pm
by March_Hare
Trolls will be trolls...
Just ignore them, don't feed them.

Re: 666

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:29 pm
by DCWhitworth
Beast wrote:
Please advise your decision.
Sincerely Yours, Edward Pogorelov.
My decision is to not waste my timeon this unless you actually bother to state what your point is.

I am a professed atheist, while I respect others points of view on religion I do not see what selectively quoting the Bible at me is going to achieve.

Re: 666

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:11 am
by Xymox
with the absolute sliding surface which is possible under absolute symmetry of the particle in space between the three rotating particles takes the path motion on the principle of feedback with return to the initial point which creates the field of the sphere.
so some sex toy then ?

I see you have you chosen the name Beast as your own ? Are you claiming to be the beast ? That would be kinda fun and real high tech for Satan to be posting on my forum.

Im going to delete your post if you do not defend it. Its a forum, you must interact or else no spamming your ideas.

So...

Are you claiming to be Satan Mr Beast ? If not why did you use the name Beast ?

Re: 666

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:21 am
by CharmQuark
so some sex toy then ?

:lol: love that :roll:

Re: 666

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:16 am
by Beast
>I think he has missed the part in particle physics 101 where they say "subatomic particles behave like particles and waves at the same time"

>with the absolute sliding surface which is possible under absolute symmetry of the particle in space between the three rotating particles takes the path motion on the principle of feedback with return to the initial point which creates the field of the sphere.

Chapter 17
14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful (light particles
Sir Isaac Newton).

Re: 666

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:53 am
by Stephen
Sir Isaac Newton also predicted the end of the world to be later than 2060. I'm curious, what do you think of St Malachy's prophecy? False or fiction?

Re: 666

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:13 am
by Shadowdraxx
I have a theory of my own too, but its that out there that different that you would turn into a potato the second i revealed it to you.

And because *I* said it, its the truth.

Re: 666

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 7:04 pm
by seedyjay
Where would somebody from 2,000 (or more) years ago even get an inkling of an idea about the science of today? Even 150 years ago, the notion of somebody actually walking on the moon was generally considered ridiculous.