http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8t5cRlRivA
... he starts questioning himself if he's crazy for real. The movie is inspired by the French short film La Jettée, check it out it will intrigue you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlM-IIm_2AA

Moderator: CharmQuark
I do think like you, there are no facts for what is to come, there is only mathematical guessing, these facts are known:mrgumby wrote:Once I have made that decision, it is conditional upon the facts that are available to me. If they change, I reserve the right to change my stance ... There seem to be people who don't think like this.
Yes, but that single bitch can cover the ass of a lot of pedophiles, go figure. How does he do it, yep by spreading the word. Makes me think of how can you start breaking wine glasses with one single high pitch tone.Mailo wrote:Reminds me a bit of the population density of popes in the Vatican. It is 2.3 popes per square kilometer, in case anyone is interested
Kasuha wrote:People are too crazy about ...
Yes I agree the level of matter abuse of certain people is far beyond normal. I demand you release all poor carbon atoms you hold captive in your body by tomorrow, oxygen a day after and hydrogen next day. Then we'll talk about the rest.Chelle wrote:The lhc abuses matter and will start abusing matter in a way that is far beyond normal, and we all know it, one can never be too crazy when addressing abuse.
Never heard of physical abuse, have we, of course not 'cause where here in the mental section. Indeed it's all "playing with words" ... the only problem is that cern isn't playing with words but with our safety.chriwi wrote:I think matter cannot be abused, in the same way living creatures can be, because matter has no feelings.
You are playing with words again.
Considering your previous post, I don't think you understand what 'abuse' and 'normal' means.Kasuha wrote:Yes I agree the level of matter abuse of certain people is far beyond normal.
I have contacted, physics professors, and once the questions get to be a bit tougher they respond no longer, I presume they simply don't know the answers.Stephen wrote:If you are that confident that CERN is putting us at risk, how about contacting physics professors and telling them about your ideas?
When I asked them, what about BEC, I don't get a single answer, not even a simple no.For decades, scientists have thought that the highest-energy cosmic rays—those packing up to a million trillion electronvolts—were almost exclusively protons. But data from the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina, the world’s top facility dedicated to ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, could tell a startlingly different story. At the International Cosmic Ray Conference, held from July 7 to 15 in Lodz, Poland, Auger scientists are presenting data that raises the possibility that some of those super-speedy cosmic bullets could actually be iron nuclei.
“It would surprise a lot of people if some of these particles turned out to be iron,” says Hank Glass, an Auger collaborator at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. While scientists can imagine mechanisms that would accelerate protons up to nearly the speed of light, they have no idea where ultra-energetic iron nuclei could originate.
“Then again,” Glass adds, “nature is full of surprises.”
http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breakin ... ing-earth/