Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 7:04 pm
"Da svidaniya" is Russian for "goodbye".
THE place to discuss the LHC
How is this relevant to your magnetic hole theory?MagneticTrap wrote:
red - pressure;
white - temperature;
blue - acceleration, g;
colored - concentration of particles (yellow-gas; green-solid; dark-blue - liquid).
That is one more my error. I am happy to know that Euler made the similar error (about pressure and density). I am happy to know that Loschmidt and Tziolkovskij made the similar error about gravitational gradient of temperature.
More detailes are here: THE EARTH'S CORE IS OVERHEATED EMPTINESS
1. If I use “errors” of Euler about pressure and density and of Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky about gravitational temperature gradient, I will see that black holes are impossible. To understand this you must train to work with my program. http://darkenergy.narod.ru/arc.exe Some results you can see at the quoted page about the "Overheated Emptiness inside the Earth" and at http://darkenergy.narod.ru/arc.html Pay attention at the growth of temperature under the diminishing of the objects radius under the same mass.How is this relevant to your magnetic hole theory?
And until such a time as you publish and defend these theories in an honest fashion in a public venue, these "errors" are likely to be nothing more than misunderstandings or arrogant assertions on your part.PS: To “errors” of Euler and Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky I came myself, somewhere about 2000, and I knew about the same results of Euler and Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky several years later.
Nice to be ahead of the game for onceAllan wrote:Personally I think the best thing we can do with Ivan is simply ignore him.
You're probably right. I had managed not to reply to the thread for quite a while. I think I will take your advice and leave it alone againAllan wrote:Personally I think the best thing we can do with Ivan is simply ignore him.
Protest Letter to scientific community against Big Bang Dogma was published in New Scientist and signed by thousand of well-known scientists. http://www.cosmologystatement.org/Ivan, please learn that people won't give any weight to what you believe until you act in a rational fashion. Instead of spending your time making these scare mongering claims, write a clear, concise academic paper with the full workings and details of your theories, and submit it for peer review.
That is standard "argument" of criminal scientists, who have no logical arguments against the truth. Believe your potential killer, Brian Cox and others.Anyway he's a Tw@t (source Prof B. Cox)
I have no addresses of them.Does any of these well known scientists claim the LHC is dangerous? Do you think any of them will believe your theory of magnetic holes?