LHC portal

"Da svidaniya" is Russian for "goodbye".

according to google the 2nd post only means: "don't be sad"

Yup, that's how far I got with Babel Fish as well.

(It's interesting by the way, how 3 different translation engines "translate" it the same way. You'd almost think...)

Bible Genesis 9.13-16
I do set my bow (rainbow - 7 noble gases - inertia - rest) in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.

Dear Sirs!
I kindly ask you to do applied research of water burning in the
reserved space of sphere. Analogy: the kernel of the planet, the kernel
of a living cell.
Sincerely Yours, Edward Pogorelov.

Earth:
red - pressure;
white - temperature;
blue - acceleration, g;
colored - concentration of particles (yellow-gas; green-solid; dark-blue - liquid).

That is one more my error. I am happy to know that Euler made the similar error (about pressure and density). I am happy to know that Loschmidt and Tziolkovskij made the similar error about gravitational gradient of temperature.


More detailes are here: THE EARTH'S CORE IS OVERHEATED EMPTINESS
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/engearth.html

MagneticTrap wrote:

Earth:
red - pressure;
white - temperature;
blue - acceleration, g;
colored - concentration of particles (yellow-gas; green-solid; dark-blue - liquid).

That is one more my error. I am happy to know that Euler made the similar error (about pressure and density). I am happy to know that Loschmidt and Tziolkovskij made the similar error about gravitational gradient of temperature.


More detailes are here: THE EARTH'S CORE IS OVERHEATED EMPTINESS
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/engearth.html

How is this relevant to your magnetic hole theory?

How is this relevant to your magnetic hole theory?

1. If I use “errors” of Euler about pressure and density and of Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky about gravitational temperature gradient, I will see that black holes are impossible. To understand this you must train to work with my program. http://darkenergy.narod.ru/arc.exe Some results you can see at the quoted page about the "Overheated Emptiness inside the Earth" and at http://darkenergy.narod.ru/arc.html Pay attention at the growth of temperature under the diminishing of the objects radius under the same mass.

2. The “error” of Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky now has the solid experimental evidence. Consequently, we have the error of Clausius in physics. He said “Energy in Universe conserved. Entropy of Universe grows.” This biggest error of physics leads to several other errors:
a/ The thermal death of Universe is error.
b/ Big Bag model of Universe is error.
c/ Stars have eternal sources of energy. These sources give NOW 2/3 of Solar energy out put. The nuclear sources give NOW the rest, - 1/3 of Solar energy output. The experiments with solar neutrino confirm this conclusion; - we did see exactly this part the neutrino deficit.
d/ But BB religious physicist invented neutrino oscillation and continue to lie, as if 2/3 of solar neutrino are oscillate and we can not see them. Lie!
e/ In fact the formula of Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky coincides with formulae of Unruh/Hawking for temperature, if we consider it, as a gradient (look my earlier message here). Unruh/Hawking formula, in fact, describes the stellar energy output. Consequently there is no process of “black hole evaporation”.

So, there are no black holes; there is no process of black holes evaporation.
But cosmic observations of gamma-bursts say us, that there are some types of collapses.

What collapses did occur in the Universe? How did they start?
Magnetic at first stage; gravitational at the second stage without any BH creation, but accompanied by gamma-burst.
Magnetic collapse can start at proton collisions at collider.

The Earth will be exploded soon. Physicist from CERN will never say that they were wrong.
They want to see at the first seconds of their Big Bang Dogma!
Ha-ha-ha! They will kill all of us. They will kill their mothers and children. It is pity, but we can not save them. We are hostages of this deadly game, the Big Russian Roulette. Now, at 3.5 TeV energy per proton, the Roulette has three bullets and rest three cells are empty. Compute the probability of our survival.

PS: To “errors” of Euler and Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky I came myself, somewhere about 2000, and I knew about the same results of Euler and Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky several years later.

PS: To “errors” of Euler and Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky I came myself, somewhere about 2000, and I knew about the same results of Euler and Loschidt/Tsiolkovsky several years later.

And until such a time as you publish and defend these theories in an honest fashion in a public venue, these "errors" are likely to be nothing more than misunderstandings or arrogant assertions on your part.

Ivan, please learn that people won't give any weight to what you believe until you act in a rational fashion. Instead of spending your time making these scare mongering claims, write a clear, concise academic paper with the full workings and details of your theories, and submit it for peer review.

Making these claims without experimental evidence, or even internal consistency, will do nothing for you.

I am extremely skeptical that Ivan is capable of doing that. So far nothing he has written here or on his web sites so far show even the slightest ability to do what you are asking of him to do. Personally I think the best thing we can do with Ivan is simply ignore him.

Allan

Allan wrote:Personally I think the best thing we can do with Ivan is simply ignore him.
Allan

Nice to be ahead of the game for once

Anyway he's a Tw@t (source Prof B. Cox)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZQknqX5DpU

Allan wrote:Personally I think the best thing we can do with Ivan is simply ignore him.

Allan

You're probably right. I had managed not to reply to the thread for quite a while. I think I will take your advice and leave it alone again

Ivan, please learn that people won't give any weight to what you believe until you act in a rational fashion. Instead of spending your time making these scare mongering claims, write a clear, concise academic paper with the full workings and details of your theories, and submit it for peer review.

Protest Letter to scientific community against Big Bang Dogma was published in New Scientist and signed by thousand of well-known scientists. http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
But official science is governed now by religious group of BigBangers.

BigBangers will explode the Earth with the help of LHC.
Court’s cases, switched by Rössler and Wagner will not save us.
Judges will not believe them, but they will listen criminal bigbangers majority.

Most of you, those, who wrote in this thread, are also supporters of bigbangers majority.
You are supporters of killers of your mothers and children.

Anyway he's a Tw@t (source Prof B. Cox)

That is standard "argument" of criminal scientists, who have no logical arguments against the truth. Believe your potential killer, Brian Cox and others.

Good luck to your mother and children.
When the Earth will explode; when a selling in your home will smash you and them, please, recall me and say: “Ivan is a t..t!”

Does any of these well known scientists claim the LHC is dangerous? Do you think any of them will believe your theory of magnetic holes?

Does any of these well known scientists claim the LHC is dangerous? Do you think any of them will believe your theory of magnetic holes?

I have no addresses of them.
Theory of magnetic hole is vary young, - slightly more than one year.
At that time CERN already had banned to write anywhere about potential dangers from LHS.
So, I was banned almost immediately, where I tried to write about magnetic holes. At some forums I was automatically banned, before registration!
At some forums my threads were deleted.

CERN physicists investigated only four potentially dangerous objects. The most dangerous object, from their point of view, is black hole. But they know that, to destroy the Earth a black hole needs from million to billion years. So, they can make the Experiment. But they do not know what magnetic hole is. They do not know that, to destroy the Earth a magnetic hole needs from 1000 seconds to 1000 days.

Once more to your question. In order to explain what magnetic hole is, we must to discuss it, we need time. I Russia I had explained it to only a few people in internet forums.

I tried to write letters to other scientists and politicians and I soon discovered that my Email was denoted as spammer; - my letters arrived directly into spam-box.

So, is it possible to deliver the theory to people if you are banned to do that?

Why does official science forbid the theory of magnetic hole? That is most dangerous object.
It will kill the humanity very soon with probability about 50%. Who are CERN officials then? Scientists or criminals? Why would not conduct a Seminar about safety about magnetic holes? Why would not welcome the authors; why would not test and study their programs. No! That is impossible because it is a shame for CERN. So, they will better go at risk and explode the Earth, than think about your life.

Ваня. Блудница давит мандавошек.