Several biggest errors of particle physicists.

[Beast]

chriwi read Bible Genesis.

[Stephen]

Not to be annoying, but can anyone address Ivan's latest claims?

[chriwi]

As far as I can see Ivan is only repeating his former claims and added nothing new.

@beast:
I cannot remember to have seen the word vacuum in the bible.

beye

chriwi

[Stephen]

So you have time to argue with people online, but you don't have time to tell about your theory to a scientist who doesn't believe in the big bang?
http://internal.physics.uwa.edu.au/~john/

[Beast]

Здесь только мандавошки?

[March_Hare]

English please here on the forum, or you risk having your post reported and possibly removed by a moderator.

[Stephen]

According to online translation, he said "are there only crab louse here?" Not sure what it means.

[CharmQuark]

According to online translation, he said "are there only crab louse here?"

Whatever that means.

WTF why has he highjacked Ivan thread anyways

[Beast]

брысь нечистая

[Stephen]

I'm seriousely worried. It seems collision of heavy ions in the universe are less powerful than collisions of heavy ion in the LHC.
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/ ... rayshi.jpg

[spencer]

Magnetic Trap
 
I consider multiple posting of identical material and the repetitive posting of home pages, nothing more than brainwashing propaganda.
 
This is not evaluation or discussion.
 
Let me suggest that, we just sit back and watch Beast play Russian Roulette with a derringer.


side note: Stephen always does interesting research.

[MagneticTrap]

So you have time to argue with people online, but you don't have time to tell about your theory to a scientist who doesn't believe in the big bang?
http://internal.physics.uwa.edu.au/~john/

Stephen, if you want to help me, send me a hundred of e-mails, I’ll send them a letter. My address: darkenergy@yandex.ru

Здесь только мандавошки?

Beast, please, do not spam in this thread.

As far as I can see Ivan is only repeating his former claims and added nothing new.

New? Yes, there is something new. I show new scientific article, written in Russian, http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/1878/article_28613.pdf , where you can see some results, analogues to my results. But the authors did not made any catastrophic conclusions.

Analogies:
Chiral magnetic effect discovered at RHIC collider. B~10^15 T. Lattice. Separation of electric charge. And so on.

My conclusions you know:

Conclusion: There are already several little sprouts of magnetic holes theory, but the theory delays drastically comparatively to the experiment. The 20-th February CERN begins work with 3.5 TeV energies per proton. I give 50% that the Earth will be exploded in the nearest weeks.

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/

[Beast]

Тебе божевільний сам Бог не поможет.

[Stephen]

Didn't you say your email was blocked or defined as spam? Moreover, if you only send them emails it'll be easier for them to ignore you or dismiss your theory without any thought. I learned that if you took the time to contact scientists directly (by calling them), they are more willing to take the time to listen to you and your theories. You will make several phone calls abroad, and in return you might get a chance to voice your theories to people who can actually make a difference, unlike you. I think that's a fair trade.

[Shadowdraxx]

ok ok chill your beans, Ivans claims have never been backed up by any mathimatical evidance that can be looked at, because there is non.

Ok heavy ion collisions are of academic purpose only they energy released inside is nothing high enough to touch any very hypothetical theory.

Stephen, i am away now for some time so might not always get on, however i'd suggest making a post in this thread, asking if someone caan break it down for you.

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=85716

They are good guys and are always ready to answer well structured and legit questions.