Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Moderator: CharmQuark
Forum rules
Any controversial topic can be discussed. Freedom of expression is encouraged. The scientific validity of things posted in this forum may stray from reality quite wildly and the reader is advised to keep that in mind. Please refrain from bad language and DO NOT get overly abusive with other members. You MUST post in English. It is OK to have fiercely intense debate. This forum has no connection with CERN, the LHC or my site. The views here do not represent the forum's views or my views in any way. It is meant as a place to debate or discuss subjects that may create heated debate. Almost no moderation will occur in this forum at all.
Any controversial topic can be discussed. Freedom of expression is encouraged. The scientific validity of things posted in this forum may stray from reality quite wildly and the reader is advised to keep that in mind. Please refrain from bad language and DO NOT get overly abusive with other members. You MUST post in English. It is OK to have fiercely intense debate. This forum has no connection with CERN, the LHC or my site. The views here do not represent the forum's views or my views in any way. It is meant as a place to debate or discuss subjects that may create heated debate. Almost no moderation will occur in this forum at all.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:42 pm
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
You beat me to it Stephen=) I suppose the only evidence we'll get from him is yet another calculation made by his Tetris-based programme. But if I'm wrong, it would be really nice to see either (a) how a potential increase in excess neutrino flux would be harmful or (b) an explanation as to how they correspond to his magnetic black holes.
Since the standard model of particle physics is more than a little obsolete according to none other than Gorelik himself, it would be fun to see how he manages to link neutrino flux to his ground breaking mBH's theory...
Since the standard model of particle physics is more than a little obsolete according to none other than Gorelik himself, it would be fun to see how he manages to link neutrino flux to his ground breaking mBH's theory...
- tswsl1989
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:22 pm
- Location: Swansea, Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Or indeed link any of his "science" to the rest of the real worldSince the standard model of particle physics is more than a little obsolete according to none other than Gorelik himself, it would be fun to see how he manages to link neutrino flux to his ground breaking mBH's theory...
- MagneticTrap
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:56 pm
- Location: Ukraine Crimea Feodosia
- Contact:
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
I do not know if there are some online internet pages, which show the present flux of neutrino.Stephen wrote:Do you have any evidence supporting this specific statement?MagneticTrap wrote:we are able to register the excessive flux of neutrino from the Earth already now!
If present flux of neutrino is the same as it was years ago, then there are no any droplets of dangerous condensate inside the Earth. Then there is no need to wait for about 1000 days in order to know, are we save.
But do not forget about future ion-ion collisions and about 2*7 TeV p-p collisions in 2013.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:42 pm
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
So you don't have any meassurments on the neutrino flux then?MagneticTrap wrote:I do not know if there are some online internet pages, which show the present flux of neutrino.Stephen wrote:Do you have any evidence supporting this specific statement?MagneticTrap wrote:we are able to register the excessive flux of neutrino from the Earth already now!
If present flux of neutrino is the same as it was years ago, then there are no any droplets of dangerous condensate inside the Earth. Then there is no need to wait for about 1000 days in order to know, are we save.
But do not forget about future ion-ion collisions and about 2*7 TeV p-p collisions in 2013.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
The answer would be no.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Wow Ivan, you can measure the neutrino flux yourself?MagneticTrap wrote:we are able to register the excessive flux of neutrino from the Earth already now!
(later...)
I do not know if there are some online internet pages, which show the present flux of neutrino.
That's impressive. How do you build your own neutrino detector?
- Tau
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:42 pm
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Perhaps he's able to catch them in his tinfoil hat:PTau wrote:Wow Ivan, you can measure the neutrino flux yourself?MagneticTrap wrote:we are able to register the excessive flux of neutrino from the Earth already now!
(later...)
I do not know if there are some online internet pages, which show the present flux of neutrino.
That's impressive. How do you build your own neutrino detector?
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Perhaps his detector is shaped like a Klein Bottle ... based upon his own image for Ivan is a Human Klein Bottle.
Definition: Human Klein Bottle -- A person with his foot in his mouth and his head up his ass!
Definition: Human Klein Bottle -- A person with his foot in his mouth and his head up his ass!
- CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
oh Ivan
One day I hope you are not scared however this might be when we all disappear into your magnetic hole
One day I hope you are not scared however this might be when we all disappear into your magnetic hole
Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Oh I understand the big red statement now. It means "if there was a neutrino flux, we would register it". That's a good news actually because as far as I know, none of world's neutrino detectors reports anything unusual.
- MagneticTrap
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:56 pm
- Location: Ukraine Crimea Feodosia
- Contact:
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
If the duration of Earth’s explosion is 1000 days, if the intensity of explosion is indeed follows to the cubic parabola, as it follows from my program, then the intensity of neutrino flux at the 100-th day is L*(R/r)^2 * (100/1000)^3, where L – intensity of solar neutrino flux; R – distance from Earth to Sun; r – radius of the Earth. It is clear, that such flux can easily be registered.Kasuha wrote:Oh I understand the big red statement now. It means "if there was a neutrino flux, we would register it".
I would not say this, because the time of publication of scientific papers is measured in years; from the other hand, we do not know if there were some online screen about neutrino flux. If you know, please, give me a link.Kasuha wrote:Oh I understand the big red statement now. It means "if there was a neutrino flux, we would register it". That's a good news actually because as far as I know, none of world's neutrino detectors reports anything unusual.
--------
Here is another interesting link CERN affirms the LHC will start production of strangelets on 11-9.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Come on, you know that if there was any significant change to neutrino flow we'd know about it already pretty much as we knew about your beloved supernova's neutrino wave way before official materials were published.MagneticTrap wrote:I would not say this, because the time of publication of scientific papers is measured in years; from the other hand, we do not know if there were some online screen about neutrino flux.
So your statement was just proving you wrong.
- MagneticTrap
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:56 pm
- Location: Ukraine Crimea Feodosia
- Contact:
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Kasuha wrote:Come on, you know that if there was any significant change to neutrino flow we'd know about it already pretty much as we knew about your beloved supernova's neutrino wave way before official materials were published.
So your statement was just proving you wrong.
According to this formula, at the end of the first day the flux of neutrino will be about a half from the Solar flux, which is measured at the Erath orbit; at the end of the tenth day the flux of neutrino from the Earth will be approximately equal to 500 solar fluxes; at the end of the hundredth day the flux of neutrino from the Earth will be approximately equal to 500 000 solar fluxes; at the end of the LAST thousandth day the flux of neutrino from the Earth will be approximately equal to 500 000 000 solar neutrino fluxes.MagneticTrap wrote:If the duration of Earth’s explosion is 1000 days, if the intensity of explosion is indeed follows to the cubic parabola, as it follows from my program, then the intensity of neutrino flux at the 100-th day is L*(R/r)^2 * (100/1000)^3, where L – intensity of solar neutrino flux; R – distance from Earth to Sun; r – radius of the Earth. It is clear, that such flux can easily be registered.
Interactions of neutrino with the ordinary matter are very rarefied, but nevertheless these interactions occur sometime. Neutrino observatories work just on those rarefied interactions. These rarefied interactions lead to some nuclear reactions and heat output. Consequently, if dangerous droplets were already created, and if their quantity and production rate correspond to supposed ones, then we already would register them, not only by the help of neutrino observatories, but also by the global warming and by the excessive radioactivity of surrounding matter. (I do not connect abnormally hot summer in Russia, Ukraine,.. with the droplets creation, because the rate of temperature growth is quite small and fluctuates.)
Dear people, dreaming about the Earth Explosion, do not be upset, - in a couple of months CERN plans to collide heavy ions, - that is another possibility to create a large variety of droplets of dangerous matter. Physicists will not stop their experiments till they explode the Earth. That is the Law of Biosphere’s Reproduction.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
It appears he is really getting desperate now.
He is sounding more and more like a preacher rather then a supposed physicist.
Allan
He is sounding more and more like a preacher rather then a supposed physicist.
Allan
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
OoooOo IVAN !!!!.... Welcome back !!!!!!!
Look at this
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/c ... 00909.html
Look at this
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/c ... 00909.html