Search found 168 matches
- Sun Sep 04, 2016 5:01 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
Comparing the different sources, always for delivered: LHC statistics : ATLAS 27.2, CMS 27.77, LHCb 1.35 LHC lumi plots : ATLAS 27.1, CMS 28.8, LHCb 1.28 ATLAS : 26.6 CMS : 28.97 LHCb : 1.35 "Between 27 and 29 inverse femtobarn" is probably a reasonable guess for the dataset so far. In the schedule ...
- Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:08 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:55 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: Weinbergangle occurs in Oktoquintenpotential
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14141
Re: Weinbergangle occurs in Oktoquintenpotential
Then publish it. Or put it on arXiv first.
Until that happened, can we get back to actual science?
Until that happened, can we get back to actual science?
- Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:41 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
Okay, that is... interesting.
For now the LHC is running again, initial luminosity this morning was a bit above the design luminosity.
For now the LHC is running again, initial luminosity this morning was a bit above the design luminosity.
- Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:27 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
The problem is external. Current VISTARS message:
PS vacuum issue: no beam from PS until tomorrow.
Mitigation for RB.A12 under implementation to allow physics as soon as beam back in PS
More details at 8:30 meeting on Friday
- Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:23 pm
- Forum: MoEDAL
- Topic: A paper with results, for once
- Replies: 1
- Views: 28707
Re: A paper with results, for once
I would be curious what they can do if they find a monopole. One of the search methods takes small pieces of detector material and scans them for monopoles - if they find one inside, can they isolate it and place it in a trap? Imagine they "find a new particle" - and have to be really careful not to...
- Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:16 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
It is an electric problem - the beam drilling a hole through the magnet would look differently.
Here is the last beam as it arrived at the beam dump (the image will change once they have the next dump, but then the problem has been fixed).
Here is the last beam as it arrived at the beam dump (the image will change once they have the next dump, but then the problem has been fixed).
- Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:06 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
The number of bunches went up for this run (2174), the luminosity improved only marginally. On the other hand, we have this weird ATLAS/CMS discrepancy, no idea which value to trust for overall normalization.
- Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:25 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
Performance has been worse since the MD block, lower time in stable beams and the initial luminosities are lower as well. We'll probably get some improvement from the increased number of bunches soon.
- Tue Jul 26, 2016 7:23 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: new particle with 750 GeV
- Replies: 12
- Views: 26657
Re: new particle with 750 GeV
The corresponding paper got discussed here. Someone (search for "23 July 2016 at 07:50") made some valid points about the quality of the statistical analysis in the paper.
- Sun Jul 24, 2016 8:15 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
https://lpc.web.cern.ch/lumiplots_2016_pp.htm Is this what you mean? There is also the statistics page which is linked on the portal. Something more like this: https://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC3 But a luminosity plot for a particular fill rather than over the last 24 hours....
- Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:45 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
For intermediate values in fills: only from the VISTARS pages as far as I know (see a few posts above for a record of them), or with access to experiment data. There are dedicated lifetime plots from the machine operation but I don't think they are available publicly. For (stable beam duration, inte...
- Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:03 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
The proton speed does not change. It is something like 99.999999% the speed of light - with some change in the last decimal place when we went from 4 TeV per proton (2012) to the current 6.5 (since 2015). The difference to the speed of light is about the speed of a pedestrian. The number of protons ...
- Wed Jul 20, 2016 5:46 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: ICHEP diphoton presentations: August 5
- Replies: 0
- Views: 25901
ICHEP diphoton presentations: August 5
No announcement of dedicated talks so far, so either we get something last minute (certainly possible given the rapid data collection in the last weeks) or we'll know more on August 5th, 8:00 to 9:20 Chicago time (15:00 - 16:20 CERN time): Search for high mass Higgs bosons using the ATLAS detector (...
- Mon Jul 18, 2016 1:31 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2016 operation
- Replies: 52
- Views: 89668
Re: 2016 operation
Some VISTARS pages got captured and put in time lapse videos - about one minute per day. Youtube channel