Search found 566 matches
- Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:29 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: 666
- Replies: 103
- Views: 119002
Re: 666
Please advise your decision. Sincerely Yours, Edward Pogorelov. My decision is to not waste my timeon this unless you actually bother to state what your point is. I am a professed atheist, while I respect others points of view on religion I do not see what selectively quoting the Bible at me is goi...
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:09 pm
- Forum: Quantum Philosophy
- Topic: all constants since the big bang are variable ... evolving
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16622
Re: all constants since the big bang are variable ... evolving
[pedant] But a constant can't be variable, if it was it wouldn't be a constant [/pedant]
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:17 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Time slip?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7834
Re: Time slip?
I've noticed that they often don't update the graphics in the middle of page 1 if there's nothing worth showing.
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:06 pm
- Forum: Portal link and forum suggestions
- Topic: BIG forum change & Wikipedia - help
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24788
Re: BIG forum change & Wikipedia - help
Well the link was added to the English version a few minutes ago. Added by the same person who put it on the German article.
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:03 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Daily Schedules and Hiccups
- Replies: 41
- Views: 52446
Re: Daily Schedules and Hiccups
not to sound pessimistic... but i wonder if electrical issues are going to be a recurring theme. I mean this thing needs a lot of juice and there are a lot of connections along with micronic resistance tolerances. It really is mind boggling how many things have to work together in order for this cl...
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:55 pm
- Forum: Off topic
- Topic: planets rotation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8758
Re: planets rotation
an apocalypse in the year not to be named. More like pretty much any year that you care to name :roll: The end of the world has been predicted so many times its getting pretty tedious. I don't really see the point, I mean it's not like your going to get any satisfaction from being right is it ?
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:49 pm
- Forum: Portal link and forum suggestions
- Topic: Forum Picture
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4702
Forum Picture
Chris, now that the LHC is producing real data it might be time to think about replacing the great but simulated picture you have on the portal for a real one ?
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:41 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: OLDER 2/15/10 ** current events and discussion **
- Replies: 54
- Views: 70301
Re: ** current events and discussion **
Wow, at this rate they'll reach the full 14 TeV in less than a year. These guys lose no time. ;) Anyway I believe after setting a new world record at 2.36 TeV they will now focus on ramping up the intensity rather than the energy. That would certainly make sense. They need higher intensity to produ...
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:29 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: *** 2.36TeV collisions ***
- Replies: 20
- Views: 27791
Re: *** POSSIBLE 2.3TeV collisions ***
http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/E ... vents.html
I'm wrong, I'm very wrong. And I'm very glad I am wrong.
Wow - good spot Chris and way to go LHC guys !
I'm wrong, I'm very wrong. And I'm very glad I am wrong.
Wow - good spot Chris and way to go LHC guys !
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:27 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: *** 2.36TeV collisions ***
- Replies: 20
- Views: 27791
Re: *** POSSIBLE 2.3TeV collisions ***
OK, sceptic here
Beam 1 was lost pretty soon after they hit 1.18 TeV, make the possiblity of collisons low I think. I hope I'm wrong though.
Beam 1 was lost pretty soon after they hit 1.18 TeV, make the possiblity of collisons low I think. I hope I'm wrong though.
- Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:57 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: OLDER 2/15/10 ** current events and discussion **
- Replies: 54
- Views: 70301
Re: ** current events and discussion **
In retrospect I'm not convinced. Beam 1 was lost pretty soon after they hit 1.18 TeV. I hope I'm wrong though.Xymox wrote:***** POSSIBLE 2.36TeV collisions ******
ALERT...
Lets wait for confirmation..... 1.18 TeV per beam is confirmed...
- Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:51 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: OLDER 2/15/10 ** current events and discussion **
- Replies: 54
- Views: 70301
Re: ** current events and discussion **
Mmm, I thought something was going on.Xymox wrote:***** POSSIBLE 2.36TeV collisions ******
ALERT...
Lets wait for confirmation..... 1.18 TeV per beam is confirmed...
- Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:17 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: OLDER 2/15/10 ** current events and discussion **
- Replies: 54
- Views: 70301
Re: ** current events and discussion **
[pedant] 0.98 TeV actually [/pedant]Gryzo wrote:I also read the progress report as "1.1 TeV collissions Friday night".
The 1.1 is of course no coincidence, as the Tevatron only does 1 TeV.
- Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:03 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: OLDER 2/15/10 ** current events and discussion **
- Replies: 54
- Views: 70301
Re: ** current events and discussion **
Ramp alert ! 2 beams, 2 bunches.
- Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:08 pm
- Forum: Off topic
- Topic: My Setup - Arms Race !!
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21178
Re: My Setup - Arms Race !!
Is that an activex wallpaper ?Danny252 wrote:http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/2024/screenieb.jpg
Automatically updates my desktop every 10 seconds, so whenever I alt-tab...