Search found 182 matches
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:53 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
- Replies: 56
- Views: 64776
Re: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
ahh that's nice to hear matie
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:38 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Cats have taken over the LHC!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8776
Re: Cats have taken over the LHC!
this is my frav one:
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:36 pm
- Forum: Portal link and forum suggestions
- Topic: Portal web outage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14231
Re: Portal web outage
aye no worries cheers man
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:36 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
- Replies: 56
- Views: 64776
Re: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
[/color]
I ask out of my own personal experience really
Has it helped? do you feel that you are in a better position not to be so worried?Stephen wrote:I talked to physicists who answered all of my questions.
I ask out of my own personal experience really
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:44 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
- Replies: 56
- Views: 64776
Re: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
For anyone interested, I found out that white dwarfs and neutron stars are only partly protected by their large magnetic fields. Magnetic fields are indeed helpful in preventing some cosmic rays from harming these stars, but other cosmic rays still manage to penetrate these fields. Basically, it al...
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:42 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: Magnetic Monopoles Search at the LHC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5627
Re: Magnetic Monopoles Search at the LHC
Yeah someone here mentioned it, the comedy aspect is this experiment costs like 14 pence to make lol cause its just tin foil on the walls.
still makes me wonder, "no no no magnetic monopoles don't exist etc etc" in safety reports then bam an experiment to try to find them, erm ook.
still makes me wonder, "no no no magnetic monopoles don't exist etc etc" in safety reports then bam an experiment to try to find them, erm ook.
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:17 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Anti LHC, already proven wrong?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 29301
Re: Anti LHC, already proven wrong?
In the case of Wagner, he has never ever actually said "he believe's" because of his own work. He likes to sound important because he shows other peoples work that "indicates" all this stuff Anti LHC ppl say. Asking Wagner to show physics is like asking a goldfish to talk. Every anti LHC person pull...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:09 am
- Forum: End Of The World
- Topic: Tinfoiltards mentioned in El. Reg.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 19596
Re: Tinfoiltards mentioned in El. Reg.
Well...
Could be Berlin, but more importantly, why are you wearing an arsenal hat hmm?.
Other than that I smell a Urban Explorer, I know Chris is of sorts .
Could be Berlin, but more importantly, why are you wearing an arsenal hat hmm?.
Other than that I smell a Urban Explorer, I know Chris is of sorts .
- Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:56 am
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Review of Long-Term Black Hole Risks
- Replies: 56
- Views: 64776
Re: Review of Black Hole Risks
Ok, so tempers flair, but yeah I know what its like when you think you have it all figured out finally, then for someone to pull another trick out of the hat. So I understand this stephen, but I guess everyone is really tired of claim/counter claim etc etc, I'm tired of it too, tired of having to go...
- Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:10 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2010 Briefings, Schedules and Problems
- Replies: 48
- Views: 61123
Re: 2010 Briefings, Schedules and Problems
Nevermind I managed to find the full thingShadowdraxx wrote:
Hmm is there still a 3 day stop on monday the 22nd or did the one this week replace that (meaning they are ahead).
- Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:14 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2010 Briefings, Schedules and Problems
- Replies: 48
- Views: 61123
Re: 2010 Briefings, Schedules and Problems
17 WE M 0700-1500 nQPS re-parameterization part 2/TECHNICAL STOP / CHECK SPS beam check beam quality from SPS for 5e10 in TL 17 WE A 1500-0000 HWC tests / Operational cycle tests S34 45 78 81 / CHECK SPS beam 17 WE N 0000-0400 Ramp for LBDS tests - no beam. LBDS energy tracking, BETS tolerances and...
- Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:58 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Black hole creation etc, what energy?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10902
Re: Black hole creation etc, what energy?
oh sorry try this:
http://www.sciforums.com/member.php?u=22682
go to stats and u can see all his posts.
He is very active on this forum, but wont reply directly to LHC related questions about his "theories".
It's like it never existed
http://www.sciforums.com/member.php?u=22682
go to stats and u can see all his posts.
He is very active on this forum, but wont reply directly to LHC related questions about his "theories".
It's like it never existed
- Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:13 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Black hole creation etc, what energy?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10902
Re: Black hole creation etc, what energy?
He's too busy fighting in court cases against him, and well after the daily show no-one takes him for anything other than a "crackpot".
However if you soley interested in him he lives on the internet here:
http://www.sciforums.com/search.php?searchid=4417439
However if you soley interested in him he lives on the internet here:
http://www.sciforums.com/search.php?searchid=4417439
- Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:49 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Black hole creation etc, what energy?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 10902
Re: Black hole creation etc, what energy?
most (read the only 2) public figures who were anti LHC, pointed to theorys at the LHC's design energy 14 Tev.
If I get some time ill do a write up on the various anti LHC people and where they are.
If I get some time ill do a write up on the various anti LHC people and where they are.
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:26 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
- Replies: 1135
- Views: 1381729
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
I did, they taught me that your theory fails, at its first inception, so am I to blame for not understading your clearly superior intellect?MagneticTrap wrote:You both (Shadowdraxx and JNW) must go to school once more and to study magnetic interactions.Shadowdraxx wrote:...Still thanks JNW for that detailed breakdown