LHC portal

ahh that's nice to hear matie

this is my frav one:

aye no worries cheers man

[/color]

Stephen wrote:I talked to physicists who answered all of my questions.

Has it helped? do you feel that you are in a better position not to be so worried?

I ask out of my own personal experience really

For anyone interested, I found out that white dwarfs and neutron stars are only partly protected by their large magnetic fields. Magnetic fields are indeed helpful in preventing some cosmic rays from harming these stars, but other cosmic rays still manage to penetrate these fields. Basically, it al...

Yeah someone here mentioned it, the comedy aspect is this experiment costs like 14 pence to make lol cause its just tin foil on the walls.

still makes me wonder, "no no no magnetic monopoles don't exist etc etc" in safety reports then bam an experiment to try to find them, erm ook.

In the case of Wagner, he has never ever actually said "he believe's" because of his own work. He likes to sound important because he shows other peoples work that "indicates" all this stuff Anti LHC ppl say. Asking Wagner to show physics is like asking a goldfish to talk. Every anti LHC person pull...

Well...

Could be Berlin, but more importantly, why are you wearing an arsenal hat hmm?.

Other than that I smell a Urban Explorer, I know Chris is of sorts .

Ok, so tempers flair, but yeah I know what its like when you think you have it all figured out finally, then for someone to pull another trick out of the hat. So I understand this stephen, but I guess everyone is really tired of claim/counter claim etc etc, I'm tired of it too, tired of having to go...

Shadowdraxx wrote:
Hmm is there still a 3 day stop on monday the 22nd or did the one this week replace that (meaning they are ahead).

Nevermind I managed to find the full thing

17 WE M 0700-1500 nQPS re-parameterization part 2/TECHNICAL STOP / CHECK SPS beam check beam quality from SPS for 5e10 in TL 17 WE A 1500-0000 HWC tests / Operational cycle tests S34 45 78 81 / CHECK SPS beam 17 WE N 0000-0400 Ramp for LBDS tests - no beam. LBDS energy tracking, BETS tolerances and...

oh sorry try this:

http://www.sciforums.com/member.php?u=22682

go to stats and u can see all his posts.

He is very active on this forum, but wont reply directly to LHC related questions about his "theories".

It's like it never existed

He's too busy fighting in court cases against him, and well after the daily show no-one takes him for anything other than a "crackpot".

However if you soley interested in him he lives on the internet here:


http://www.sciforums.com/search.php?searchid=4417439

most (read the only 2) public figures who were anti LHC, pointed to theorys at the LHC's design energy 14 Tev.

If I get some time ill do a write up on the various anti LHC people and where they are.

MagneticTrap wrote:

Shadowdraxx wrote:...Still thanks JNW for that detailed breakdown

You both (Shadowdraxx and JNW) must go to school once more and to study magnetic interactions.

I did, they taught me that your theory fails, at its first inception, so am I to blame for not understading your clearly superior intellect?